<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paleo-Electronics Blog &#187; Skylark Rebuid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/category/skylark-rebuid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog</link>
	<description>Clueless Idiots and High Voltage Vacuum Tubes Really Do Mix!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Find : A Totally Different Crestline GA-5 Schematic</title>
		<link>http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/2010/08/new-find-ga-5-schematic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/2010/08/new-find-ga-5-schematic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 16:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dilapidus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amp Repair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skylark Rebuid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 'new' schematic for GA-5 Crestline amps has been discovered.   ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a new schematic for the Crestline GA &#8211; 5&#8242;s by accident on ebay.   I <em>thought </em>I was buying an original manual / schematic that came with the Skylarks, but instead I got a reproduction.   Sigh.   The good news is that the schematic is very different than any other I&#8217;ve seen.   Some very exciting stuff in here.</p>
<p><span id="more-225"></span></p>
<p>Here is a link to the raw scan :  <a title="The full size schematic" href="http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/GA5Crestline-with-102c84.png">4 Meg PNG</a></p>
<p>And one in a more palatable 290K size</p>
<div id="attachment_232" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/GA5Crestline-with-102c84-1024.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-232" title="GA5Crestline with 102c84 (1024)" src="http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/GA5Crestline-with-102c84-1024-300x217.png" alt="" width="300" height="217" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Smaller but very decent GA-5 Crestline Schematic</p></div>
<p>So where to begin?   The first thing is details.   This schematic is full of details that I have not seen on GA5 schematics before.   Some are trivial (it includes part numbers) and others are very useful (the output tranny is 8k/8 Ω).   </p>
<p>Secondly, topology.   This amp is significantly different in some design details.  </p>
<p>Third, local interest.    This is GA-5 but the topology matches my GA-5T, so I have a better idea of what was original in the amp that I have on the rack at this  moment.</p>
<p>I have slurped every GA-5 Schematic I could find and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever come across one like this, so I am kind of excited to show this.    Naturally, it is my scan of a very old document.  This image is in the public domain.  I didn&#8217;t even watermark it.</p>
<p>Enjoy, and I&#8217;ll be commenting further on the details shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/2010/08/new-find-ga-5-schematic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Skylark Rebuild : Last things first</title>
		<link>http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/2009/12/skylark-rebuild-last-things-first/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/2009/12/skylark-rebuild-last-things-first/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dilapidus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amp mods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skylark Rebuid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[753397]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GA-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gibson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gibson Skylark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skylark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what the old girl looks like right now : Now it&#8217;s not going to matter one bit if I don&#8217;t do anything about the looks, but it would be nice to get her cleaned up. There is no way I am going to be able to clean around the silk-screened lettering or lines. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what the old girl looks like right now :</p>
<div id="attachment_213" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/skylarkrust.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-213" title="skylarkrust" src="http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/skylarkrust-300x128.png" alt="Skylark Faceplate with plenty of rust" width="300" height="128" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Skylark Faceplate with plenty of rust (click for fullsize image)</p></div>
<p>Now it&#8217;s not going to matter one bit if I don&#8217;t do anything about the looks, but it would be nice to get her cleaned up.   There is no way I am going to be able to clean around the silk-screened lettering or lines.    So the whole thing is going to have to come off.   I don&#8217;t even know how you clean these things.</p>
<p>Now, the chassis is actually just a single piece of metal, bent and punched.  I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s steel or aluminum but either way, it&#8217;s easily bendable.<br />
Here is a picture of one out of the cabinet :</p>
<div id="attachment_41" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/thevictim.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-41" title="GA-5T on bench" src="http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/thevictim-300x200.jpg" alt="5T Chassis out of cabinet and looking from behind" width="300" height="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">5T Chassis out of cabinet and looking from behind</p></div>
<p>So I suppose I could just have one remade.   That would surely cost more than the amp, but I&#8217;d come out of it with the specs for new metal, which would be a good thing for anyone else trying to do this.  Then I would need to get the art redone or redesign something.  Again.. favors or money and no improvement in the sound.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m leaning towards leaving it, for obvious reasons, but very early in the process I&#8217;ll have to make the decision..  anyone have any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/2009/12/skylark-rebuild-last-things-first/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rebuilding a Skylark</title>
		<link>http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/2009/11/rebuilding-a-skylark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/2009/11/rebuilding-a-skylark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amp Repair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp mods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skylark Rebuid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[753397]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regular readers (hahaha&#8230;. I kill me) will remember that I bought two Gibson Skylarks.  One of which I fixed immediately and the other sat waiting.    This is a story about the other. This is a Gibson Skylark in the &#8220;Crestline&#8221; series.  It is one of the many amps released with the GA-5T model number.   [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regular readers (hahaha&#8230;. I kill me) will remember that I bought two Gibson Skylarks.  One of which I fixed immediately and the other sat waiting.    This is a story about the other.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/IMG_0311.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-172" title="IMG_0311" src="http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/IMG_0311-150x112.jpg" alt="IMG_0311" width="150" height="112" /></a></p>
<p>This is a Gibson Skylark in the &#8220;Crestline&#8221; series.  It is one of the many amps released with the GA-5T model number.   This was made sometime in the early 60&#8242;s as the later model &#8220;Whiteface&#8221; amps would be released in &#8217;65.   This is not as popular as the true Class A SE Skylarks from the 50&#8242;s so it cost me $202.50 with shipping a couple of years back.  It&#8217;s not working right now and I&#8217;ve decided to refurb it.</p>
<p><span id="more-163"></span>When it worked (which it actually did at some point) it had the best tremolo I had ever heard.   It is so weird that Gibson tremolo is the shame of high end amp world these days.  They used to do it brilliantly.   However, I don&#8217;t like trem, so it&#8217;s going out..  in it&#8217;s place is a Master Volume.   I&#8217;ve read all the gasbags saying &#8220;It&#8217;s not the same!  You won&#8217;t get .. &#8220;  but the truth is I don&#8217;t care.  It makes a good sound.   If I get a different sound from 11 on both dials, great!  That&#8217;s just more versatility to me.</p>
<p>Here is the plan in general :</p>
<ul>
<li>Use the original  Iron, Speaker, Cabinet and Chassis as much as possible</li>
<li>Mod back to original GA-5 specs, removing tremolo circuit.   <em>except as noted below.</em></li>
<li>Replace all discretes using original bone stock values</li>
<li>Add Standby switch (hopefully I can do this with a rotary switch like they have now)</li>
<li>Use multiple parallel caps for filtering ( a la TUT5)</li>
<li>Add Master Volume before the Phase Splitter</li>
<li>Add Pentode/Triode/Other switch
<ul>
<li>Pentode &#8211; Standard operation except provide 1k flameproof resistor for each screen</li>
<li>Triode &#8211; Put the screen in the plate loop (keeping the 1k resistors)</li>
<li>Other &#8211; Lower the voltage supplied to the screen (should be something between the other two in terms of breakup)</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>&#8220;Galaxy&#8221; grounding, again, a la TUT5</li>
<li>Careful layout and use of shielded wire on the signal path.</li>
</ul>
<p>Should really be doable in a weekend if I have the parts, but I really want to nail this build, so I&#8217;ll take my time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paleoelectronics.com/blog/2009/11/rebuilding-a-skylark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
